Sunday, May 13, 2012
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Private Offering Vs. illegal fund raising under china criminal law and supreme court interpretations
Few basic factors to know re China law
·
You are subject to China law jurisdiction as
long as you are doing business in China; consequences or result are majorly
happened in China, the other party is a Chinese citizen or the agreements
between parties are stipulated to be subject to China law.
·
Subject to international law and multilateral treaties
and federal regulations, verdicts/holdings from a China court CAN be enforced
in the United States
·
Please use caution and always consult a domestic
lawyer for labor/business/government compliance issues in China
What is “Illegal fundraising” in
China criminal code law and binding Supreme Court interpretations? Here comes
my disclaimer: this is not legal advice nor legal opinion; purely for information
purposes.
There are fine lines between
illegal fundraising and private placement in China law. For all your reference, I am outlining the law
below. Please note that China is a “Code
Law” legal system society and precedents do NOT have binding judicial effects to a later
case. Also China law stipulation and degree
of enforcement are heavily dependent on the political and social climates.
On Jan 3, 2011, The Supreme People's Court released the Judicial
Interpretations to Issues Concerning Applications of Laws for Trial of Criminal
Cases on Illegal Collection of Funds.
Under the Interpretations, "where any party or individual offer, or
offer in such disguised form as equity transfer the stocks or company or
enterprise bonds to unspecific objects without approval of the relevant
authorities, or offer, or offer in disguised form stocks or company or
enterprise bonds to more than 200 individuals", such activities shall be
deemed as issuing stocks or, company or enterprise bonds without due approval
as stipulated by Article 179 of the Criminal Law; where the any crime is found,
the relevant party or individual shall be investigated and punished as the
crime of issuing stocks or, company or enterprise bonds without due approval.
The Interpretations also stipulated that where any party or individual
provide advertisement services and other promotion services for the relevant
parties or individuals under the precondition that the party or the individual
is aware that they are engaged in issuing stocks and bonds in fraud manner,
illegally raising public funds, issuing stocks or bonds without any due
approval, fraud fund-raising or organizing and leading pyramid marketing, such
party or individual shall be deemed as complicity of the crimes.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
USCIS released new I-526 and I-829 datas
美国移民局在昨天(5/12012)的StakeHolder 会议上发布了最新的I-526及I-829的数据。
数据显示2012年截至第二季度,I-526收件2771件,批准2101件,批准率为85%。I-829收件375,批准率为96%。 应该注意的是这个数字不应简单按照时间推算,因为很多案件可能是上年递交刚得到审理。不过从移民局提供的历史数据看,从2005年到目前,I-526 的总体批准率为83%, I-829的批准率为84%.
数据显示2012年截至第二季度,I-526收件2771件,批准2101件,批准率为85%。I-829收件375,批准率为96%。 应该注意的是这个数字不应简单按照时间推算,因为很多案件可能是上年递交刚得到审理。不过从移民局提供的历史数据看,从2005年到目前,I-526 的总体批准率为83%, I-829的批准率为84%.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)